IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4034 (2681)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 25 March 2011 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027943A67D4 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id drmzhX8SKsrx for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:4870:a30c:41::81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B781E3A67B7 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.2.202] ([212.47.23.197]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2PH1VdH060707 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:01:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D8AB330.5090504@ogud.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:01:30 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7306D60F-AE42-466F-AED9-51C58E32299E@vpnc.org>
References: <20110105221815.A7E0FE0701@rfc-editor.org> <4D8AB330.5090504@ogud.com>
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: sra@isc.org, gubailey@microsoft.com, dnsext@ietf.org, jari.arkko@piuha.net, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, massey@cs.colostate.edu, roy.arends@telin.nl, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4034 (2681)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:00:07 -0000

On Mar 24, 2011, at 3:57 AM, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:

> This errata is also correct,
> I ran into this same issue myself.

I am not an implementer, so I am not sure that what I say here is correct. It sounds like the normative text in Appendix B does not match the presumably normative "reference implementation" in C a few paragraphs later. If so, why does the "reference implementation" win over the C code?

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email