IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] nsec/nsec3 whitepaper as i-d

Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> Wed, 01 August 2012 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <miekg@atoom.net>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DB611E825D for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.135
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.135 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.465, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GQ9oemb52bj1 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (elektron.atoom.net [85.223.71.124]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AD211E8318 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by elektron.atoom.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8F22F3FF2F; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:16:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:16:58 +0200
From: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120801181658.GA21997@miek.nl>
Mail-Followup-To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <20120724085304.GB730@miek.nl> <20120724124430.GB5610@mail.yitter.info> <F60653CF-836B-434C-BA0C-FEB3AD0EF526@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F60653CF-836B-434C-BA0C-FEB3AD0EF526@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Vim/Mutt/Linux
X-Home: http://www.miek.nl
Subject: Re: [dnsext] nsec/nsec3 whitepaper as i-d
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:17:10 -0000

[ Quoting <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> in "Re: [dnsext] nsec/nsec3 whitepaper ..." ]
> I agree with Andrew about the "no" for the WG, but disagree with him about not publishing it as an Internet-Draft and eventually as an RFC. 

I've just uploaded an i-d version of this whitepaper:

A new version of I-D, draft-gieben-auth-denial-of-existence-dns-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by R. (Miek) Gieben and posted to the
IETF repository.

Filename:        draft-gieben-auth-denial-of-existence-dns
Revision:        00
Title:           Authenticated Denial of Existence in the DNS
Creation date:   2012-08-01
WG ID:           Individual Submission
Number of pages: 21
URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gieben-auth-denial-of-existence-dns-00.txt
Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-auth-denial-of-existence-dns
Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gieben-auth-denial-of-existence-dns-00

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email