IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6944 (4083)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 14 August 2014 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522171A0730 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 08:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A4kputv4lt0v for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 08:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86EA1A02D5 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 08:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 975A4180095; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 08:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
To: scottr.nist@gmail.com, brian@innovationslab.net, ted.lemon@nominum.com, ogud@ogud.com, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140814155125.975A4180095@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 08:51:25 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/kxGMUYYR3ZmlvECTE7tmXU2Xpxg
Cc: bmoeller@acm.org, dnsext@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6944 (4083)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 15:53:20 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6944,
"Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm Implementation Status".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6944&eid=4083

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Bodo Moeller <bmoeller@acm.org>

Section: 5.1

Original Text
-------------
N/A

Corrected Text
--------------
[RFC6605]  P. Hoffman, P., and Wijngaards, W.C.A., "Elliptic Curve
    Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) for DNSSEC", RFC 6605, 2012.


Notes
-----
This Normative Reference is simply missing from the document, even though the algorithms from RFC 6605 are "Recommended to Implement" in RFC 6944.  (Cf. how RFC 5933 is referenced, even though its algorithms are merely optional.)

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6944 (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-04)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm Implementation Status
Publication Date    : April 2013
Author(s)           : S. Rose
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : DNS Extensions
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email