Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-trans-02.txt
Samuel Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com> Fri, 25 November 2005 01:22 UTC
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EfSIW-0004cu-V3 for dnsext-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:22:45 -0500
Received: from psg.com (mailnull@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA21979 for <dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:22:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1EfSEQ-000Nsl-Jn for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 01:18:30 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
Received: from [192.94.214.100] (helo=nutshell.tislabs.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1EfSEP-000NsX-SZ for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 01:18:30 +0000
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by nutshell.tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id jAP1Dw7s028622 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:13:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from filbert.tislabs.com(10.66.1.10) by nutshell.tislabs.com via csmap (V6.0) id srcAAA7yaG33; Thu, 24 Nov 05 20:13:53 -0500
Received: from localhost (weiler@localhost) by tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jAP1FrQp025817; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:15:59 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:15:52 -0500
From: Samuel Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com>
X-X-Sender: weiler@filbert
To: Peter Koch <pk@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
cc: IETF DNSEXT WG <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-trans-02.txt
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.55.0502281512240.861@filbert>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.55.0511241958400.24204@filbert>
References: <200502242137.j1OLbqU02800@grimsvotn.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <Pine.GSO.4.55.0502281512240.861@filbert>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
I've partially reviewed trans-03. I don't think the doc is ready for WGLC. Overall recommendation: I have concerns about the wisdom of a partial typecode rollover (especially of DS, with it's oh-so-funky only-RR-not-in-the-child semantics), which is what this doc recommends. I'm OK with pushing this doc forward as a historical record, but it needs to be clearly noted (in the abstract, intro, and section 3) that the recommendation was current as of date XXX (~1 year ago), not the date of publication. Numerous editorial comments have been sent to the editors. Here are some slightly more substantive ones: ---- 2.2.3 I don't necessarily assume that the NSEC RR type won't change -- I think algorithm number signaling might be used with or without a RR type code change. Perhaps that means we should duplicate this section. Or just suggest that these signaling mechanisms might be mixed-and-matched. ---- 2.2.3.2 and 2.2.4.2 As I wrote in February, I see no need to split the algorithm number or digest algorithm number space -- we could specifcy NSEC v. NSEC3 on a per-number basis rather than saying "numbers above X are for NSEC3". On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Samuel Weiler wrote: > I also noticed that 2.2.3.2 suggests splitting the algorithm space > with each version of DNSSEC. As David Blacka's experiments draft > suggests, there might be more efficient ways to do this, and blindly > allocating half of the algorithm numbers at each versioning sounds > very limiting. -- Sam -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-trans-02.txt Internet-Drafts
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-trans-02.… Roy Arends
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-trans-02.… Samuel Weiler
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-trans-02.… Samuel Weiler
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-trans-02.… Peter Koch