IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dnsext] {Blocked Content} Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-07.txt

"Rose, Scott W." <scott.rose@nist.gov> Wed, 05 January 2011 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.rose@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C643A6C40 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 08:53:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.151
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-10.750, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, VIRUS_WARNING250=1.5, VIRUS_WARNING66=20]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id saFGQEyVUdKT for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 08:53:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.nist.gov (rimp1.nist.gov [129.6.16.226]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E023A6C21 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 08:53:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from WSXGHUB2.xchange.nist.gov (wsxghub2.nist.gov [129.6.18.19]) by smtp.nist.gov (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p05GtaZ1001607 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 11:55:36 -0500
Received: from MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov ([fe80::d479:3188:aec0:cb66]) by WSXGHUB2.xchange.nist.gov ([129.6.18.19]) with mapi; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 11:55:16 -0500
From: "Rose, Scott W." <scott.rose@nist.gov>
To: "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 11:55:18 -0500
Thread-Topic: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-07.txt
Thread-Index: Acus+VK6Q4vb7ua/RG6yyCT3TIX44w==
Message-ID: <0B0D32E9-C71F-4C9B-9E15-FD359A09F7E0@nist.gov>
References: <20110105163002.18428.42035.idtracker@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_0B0D32E9C71F4C9B9E15FD359A09F7E0nistgov_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-NIST-MailScanner: Found to be infected
X-NIST-MailScanner-From: scott.rose@nist.gov
Subject: [dnsext] {Blocked Content} Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-07.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:53:29 -0000

Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed
Warning: (not named).
Warning: Please read the following for more information.

Updated the table to stress that the column on compliance refers to compliance to this document only.  Changed other text to reflect that as much as possible.

If any text is unclear, or if I forgot to change something, let me know.

Scott


Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Internet-Drafts@ietf.org" <Internet-Drafts@ietf.org>
> Date: January 5, 2011 11:30:02 AM EST
> To: "i-d-announce@ietf.org" <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> Cc: "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>
> Subject: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-07.txt
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the DNS Extensions Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 
> 	Title           : Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry
> 	Author(s)       : S. Rose
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-07.txt
> 	Pages           : 7
> 	Date            : 2011-01-05
> 
> The DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) requires the use of
> cryptographic algorithm suites for generating digital signatures over
> DNS data.  There is currently an IANA registry for these algorithms
> that is incomplete in that it lacks the implementation status of each
> algorithm.  This document provides an applicability statement on
> algorithm implementation compliance status for DNSSEC
> implementations.  This status is to measure compliance to this RFC
> only.  This document replaces that registry table with a new IANA
> registry table for Domain Name System Security (DNSSEC) Algorithm
> Numbers that lists (or assigns) each algorithm's status based on the
> current reference.
> 
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-07.txt
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
> Internet-Draft.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email