Re: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-update-03.txt> (DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry Updates) to Proposed Standard
Scott Rose <scottr.nist@gmail.com> Mon, 16 July 2012 14:25 UTC
Return-Path: <scottr.nist@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03D321F879D; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qf24VVimkVsP; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wsget2.nist.gov (wsget2.nist.gov [129.6.13.151]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7D421F8790; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WSGHUB1.xchange.nist.gov (129.6.42.34) by wsget2.nist.gov (129.6.13.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:26:04 -0400
Received: from smtp.nist.gov (129.6.16.226) by smtp-g.nist.gov (129.6.42.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.355.2; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:26:06 -0400
Received: from 6-140.antd.nist.gov (6-140.antd.nist.gov [129.6.140.6]) by smtp.nist.gov (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q6GEQ5A3010058; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:26:06 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_815F6DFD-0B17-462C-9D85-50F01FE1BAD1"
From: Scott Rose <scottr.nist@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207140715210.95821@fledge.watson.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:26:05 -0400
Message-ID: <D7CD7207-FCDD-46FF-85B3-501DD0558B13@gmail.com>
References: <20120627135256.11457.74759.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207140715210.95821@fledge.watson.org>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-update-03.txt> (DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry Updates) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:25:27 -0000
Thanks for the review. The table in section 2.2 in the -03 draft only has the entries that need to be updated. Besides the 3 entries that are now Reserved, but the references for some other entries have been fixed. I removed the correct, unchanged entries for readability (the mnemonics for some of the entires skewed the table and made it difficult to read). Scott =================================== Scott Rose NIST scott.rose@nist.gov +1 301-975-8439 Google Voice: +1 571-249-3671 http://www.dnsops.gov/ =================================== On Jul 14, 2012, at 7:18 AM, Samuel Weiler wrote: > General comment: no objection. > > The table in section 2.2 is odd: in addition to the three entries being updated, it lists some BUT NOT ALL of the other assignments already made. I suspect that's a historical artifact. My suggestion: since the intro text in that section says "The list of .. registry entry changes is below", remove all entries that aren't changing. That will make the reader's job easier. > > -- Sam Weiler > > _______________________________________________ > dnsext mailing list > dnsext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext