[dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5155 (3479)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 07 February 2013 21:51 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA5821F87EE for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:51:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.222, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id myzh38Waig06 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:51:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613EE21F86F5 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:51:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 057D4B1E002; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:50:59 -0800 (PST)
To: ben@links.org, geoff-s@panix.com, roy@nominet.org.uk, davidb@verisign.com, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, brian@innovationslab.net, ogud@ogud.com, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20130207215059.057D4B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:50:59 -0800
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 07:12:45 -0800
Cc: andy@arin.net, dnsext@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5155 (3479)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 21:51:04 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5155, "DNS Security (DNSSEC) Hashed Authenticated Denial of Existence". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5155&eid=3479 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net> Section: Apendix A Original Text ------------- The example in Appendix A has an NSEC3 next hashed owner name field with the non-base 32 characters 9, 0, and 1. Corrected Text -------------- The example should be changed so that the field in question is valid base 32. Notes ----- Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5155 (draft-ietf-dnsext-nsec3-13) -------------------------------------- Title : DNS Security (DNSSEC) Hashed Authenticated Denial of Existence Publication Date : March 2008 Author(s) : B. Laurie, G. Sisson, R. Arends, D. Blacka Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : DNS Extensions Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5155 (347… RFC Errata System
- Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5155 … Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5155 … Andy Newton