Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft
Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau@connotech.com> Tue, 07 March 2006 02:12 UTC
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGRgH-0006oj-UY for dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:12:09 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGRgG-0003c5-Ks for dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:12:09 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1FGReX-0008lK-Oe for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 02:10:21 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SBL, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.0
Received: from [66.163.8.251] (helo=SMTP.Lamicro.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <thierry.moreau@connotech.com>) id 1FGReX-0008kl-3Z for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 02:10:21 +0000
Received: from Spooler by SMTP.Lamicro.com (Mercury/32 v4.01b) ID MO00184C; 6 Mar 2006 21:10:03 -0500
Received: from spooler by Lamicro.com (Mercury/32 v4.01b); 6 Mar 2006 21:09:58 -0500
Received: from connotech.com (209.71.204.109) by SMTP.Lamicro.com (Mercury/32 v4.01b) with ESMTP ID MG00184B; 6 Mar 2006 21:09:52 -0500
Message-ID: <440CF451.7090501@connotech.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:47:45 -0500
From: Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau@connotech.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
CC: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft
References: <200603052041.k25Kfo2N032319@localhost.localdomain> <20060306023051.3A8AD11426@sa.vix.com> <16A00D5CE200CBF7943FF27D@[192.168.100.25]> <20060306183416.E90791142C@sa.vix.com> <440CAA21.40103@connotech.com> <20060307011609.A3A9611426@sa.vix.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060307011609.A3A9611426@sa.vix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca
Paul Vixie wrote: > # > [...] [T]he TAKREM author can do a SCO or R.I.M. style attack against > # > anyone who successfully monetizes the result (that is, claiming that ALL > # > possible ways to solve this problem are covered under the TAKREM patent) > # > [...]. > # > # This is completely ridiculous! Please record my disagreement. > > so noted, for whatever that's worth. > > perhaps you can help, out of the spirit of professionalism, to steer this > WG toward solutions that do not infringe? So I'm a SCO-raider on one post, then a messianic professional WG steersman on the next! > i'm thinking that you could send > out a patent number, page, and paragraph number any time you think a proposal > here would ultimately lead the eventual holder of your IPR to come knocking? More seriously, in good faith, I abide by the disclosure rules in RFC3979. The documents for which an IPR disclosure has been made in relation to TAKREM are 1) draft-moreau-dnsext-takrem-dns 2) draft-moreau-pkix-takrem That's it. -- - Thierry Moreau CONNOTECH Experts-conseils inc. 9130 Place de Montgolfier Montreal, Qc Canada H2M 2A1 Tel.: (514)385-5691 Fax: (514)385-5900 web site: http://www.connotech.com e-mail: thierry.moreau@connotech.com -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Ted Lemon
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Thierry Moreau
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… The Purple Streak, Hilarie Orman
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Paul Vixie
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Wes Hardaker
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… bmanning
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Alex Bligh
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Hilarie Orman
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Thierry Moreau
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Ted Lemon
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Thierry Moreau
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Paul Vixie
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Paul Vixie
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Paul Vixie
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Ted Lemon
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Ben Laurie
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Paul Vixie
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollove… Paul Vixie