[dnsext] [Errata Rejected] RFC6891 (6982)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 30 May 2022 04:56 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E140C14F72F; Sun, 29 May 2022 21:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04oWyHw4w91H; Sun, 29 May 2022 21:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FC3AC14F734; Sun, 29 May 2022 21:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id EB4943BA83; Sun, 29 May 2022 21:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: contact@avnindersran.com, joao@bondis.org, explorer@flame.org, vixie@isc.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: evyncke@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, dnsext@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220530045628.EB4943BA83@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 21:56:28 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/rIwmWivftOjkvzWr1-tnn_m87b8>
Subject: [dnsext] [Errata Rejected] RFC6891 (6982)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 04:56:33 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6891, "Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0))". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6982 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Avninder Sran <contact@avnindersran.com> Date Reported: 2022-05-29 Rejected by: Eric Vyncke (IESG) Section: 4.3 Original Text ------------- Traditional DNS messages are limited to 512 octets in size when sent over UDP [RFC1035]. Fitting the increasing amounts of data that can be transported in DNS in this 512-byte limit is becoming more difficult. For instance, inclusion of DNSSEC records frequently requires a much larger response than a 512-byte message can hold. Corrected Text -------------- Traditional DNS messages are limited to 512-bytes in size when sent over UDP [RFC1035]. Fitting the increasing amounts of data that can be transported in DNS in this 512-byte limit is becoming more difficult. For instance, inclusion of DNSSEC records frequently requires a much larger response than a 512-byte message can hold. Notes ----- In the original text, it says: DNS messages are limited to 512 octets in size, but it should be 512 bytes not octets. --VERIFIER NOTES-- Most RFCs use "octets" and "bytes" as equivalent (even if I personally prefer "octets"). -------------------------------------- RFC6891 (draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0)) Publication Date : April 2013 Author(s) : J. Damas, M. Graff, P. Vixie Category : INTERNET STANDARD Source : DNS Extensions Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [dnsext] [Errata Rejected] RFC6891 (6982) RFC Errata System
- Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6891 … Ólafur Gudmundsson