IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Failure to add glue MUST cause TC to be set.

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Sun, 20 February 2011 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24A23A6F4C for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 10:48:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4zzyLQbb9+ds for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 10:48:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.151]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F152C3A6F5C for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 10:48:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from 69.91.125.91.rb4.adsl.brightview.com ([91.125.91.69]:50456 helo=[192.168.0.5]) by ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.158]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:fanf2) (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) id 1PrELL-00068g-ZQ (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Sun, 20 Feb 2011 18:49:16 +0000
References: <20110219210716.72943A5602B@drugs.dv.isc.org> <11263.1298150425@nsa.vix.com> <20110220072916.GA3505@vacation.karoshi.com.>
In-Reply-To: <20110220072916.GA3505@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8C148)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-1--54523982"
Message-Id: <30899A4A-833B-42EF-9850-AFEE8B8DBE02@dotat.at>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148)
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 18:48:57 +0000
To: "bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com" <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com>
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Failure to add glue MUST cause TC to be set.
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 18:48:42 -0000

On 20 Feb 2011, at 07:29, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> 
> doesn't that cause some tension - two zones being authoritative for the
> same data? 

No, because a parent zone is not authoritative for NS and glue address records at and below a delegation point.

Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email