Re: draft-eastlake-2606bis-00.txt: Suggestion for removal

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 04 November 2005 08:40 UTC

Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EXx7w-0005YS-2p for dnsext-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 03:40:48 -0500
Received: from psg.com (mailnull@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA02271 for <dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 03:40:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1EXx2M-0002DP-He for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:35:02 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
Received: from [192.134.4.11] (helo=mx2.nic.fr) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1EXx2L-0002Cq-OH for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:35:01 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD4026C07A for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:35:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from maya40.nic.fr (maya40.nic.fr [192.134.4.151]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F06726C0C0 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:34:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from batilda.nic.fr (postfix@batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by maya40.nic.fr (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id jA48YsYa918243 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:34:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by batilda.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2EBBB16A9A4; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:34:54 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 09:34:54 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-eastlake-2606bis-00.txt: Suggestion for removal
Message-ID: <20051104083454.GA7924@nic.fr>
References: <EEB12E1E457C2C4889480994@[192.168.100.25]> <200511031637.jA3Gbl0C006036@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200511031637.jA3Gbl0C006036@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mx2.nic.fr
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:37:47AM -0500,
 Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> wrote 
 a message of 160 lines which said:

> IMO, we should not at all. At best, include a pointer to ICANN and
> say "their turf".

Not even that, IMHO. THere is no reason for the IETF to endorse ICANN
or to imply that it has a role here.
 
> what is the problem with 2606 that needs fixing/updating?

Nobody documentd that.

> Do we actually need an updated to 2606?

No.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>