Re: [dnsext] RFC 4035 and "caching" of "expired RRSIG's"
Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> Tue, 04 January 2011 10:03 UTC
Return-Path: <fweimer@bfk.de>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873A23A6B71 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 02:03:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.115
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.115 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.134, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NDJ6GWVxIRc6 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 02:03:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx01.bfk.de (mx01.bfk.de [193.227.124.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C41B3A6B70 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 02:03:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx00.int.bfk.de ([10.119.110.2]) by mx01.bfk.de with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1Pa3lg-00037h-Bo; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:05:28 +0000
Received: by bfk.de with local id 1Pa3lg-0002zH-8r; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:05:28 +0000
To: Marc Lampo <marc.lampo@eurid.eu>
References: <000201cbabf5$0533d010$0f9b7030$@eurid.eu>
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:05:28 +0000
In-Reply-To: <000201cbabf5$0533d010$0f9b7030$@eurid.eu> (Marc Lampo's message of "Tue\, 4 Jan 2011 10\:51\:50 +0100 \(CET\)")
Message-ID: <82sjx9kmqf.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] RFC 4035 and "caching" of "expired RRSIG's"
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:03:25 -0000
* Marc Lampo: > Consequently : > Wouldn't it be wise to rephrase 4.5 of RFC4035 such that > "DNSSEC validation becomes impossible" > is meant ? Please clarify if you're concerned with TTLs or signature validity periods. (The quoted sections in the RFCs are strictly about TTLs, and not about cryptographic constraints.) -- Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 4035 and "caching" of "expired R… Marc Lampo
- [dnsext] RFC 4035 and "caching" of "expired RRSIG… Marc Lampo
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 4035 and "caching" of "expired R… Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 4035 and "caching" of "expired R… Florian Weimer