Re: DNSEXT WGLC: DS SHA-256
Wes Hardaker <hardaker@tislabs.com> Mon, 26 December 2005 20:43 UTC
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EqzBZ-0001jX-9P for dnsext-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:43:13 -0500
Received: from psg.com (mailnull@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA00955 for <dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:42:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1Eqz7E-000Lh8-Co for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:38:44 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
Received: from [168.150.236.43] (helo=wes.hardakers.net) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <hardaker@tislabs.com>) id 1Eqz7D-000Lgd-RP for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:38:43 +0000
Received: by wes.hardakers.net (Postfix, from userid 274) id 5F4EC11D3F2; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:38:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <hardaker@tislabs.com>
To: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: DNSEXT WGLC: DS SHA-256
Organization: Sparta
References: <62173B970AE0A044AED8723C3BCF23810C13DF13@ma19exm01.e6.bcs.mot.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:38:39 -0800
In-Reply-To: <62173B970AE0A044AED8723C3BCF23810C13DF13@ma19exm01.e6.bcs.mot.com> (Eastlake III Donald-LDE's message of "Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:08:32 -0500")
Message-ID: <sdirtblhkg.fsf@wes.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
>>>>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:08:32 -0500, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com> said: Eastlake> I support this document; however, I believe it should also Eastlake> reference draft-eastlake-sha2-*.txt which has source code Eastlake> for SHA-256 (currently -00 but about to be updated to -01). (I'm interested in other people's opinions) Questions: Whats the timeline status for this document? Is it near completion (on the order of weeks) or do you expect to have it advance by when? What track is it on? Personal submission as informative? If the working group wants this, should to be informative or normative? I think informative is right here (as the code reference isn't required, unlike the spec reference which must be understood). -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: DS SHA-256 Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: DS SHA-256 Wes Hardaker
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: DS SHA-256 Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: DS SHA-256 Eastlake III Donald-LDE008