[DNSOP] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-13: (with COMMENT)

[Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work on this document. Many thanks to Jean Mahoney for her ART
ART review:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/YAoRhQIrKn4g0L6XFZvV45bWL44/.

I only have one very minor comments, to take or leave as you please:

   headers are 40 bytes (versus 20 without options in IPv4).  Second, it
   seems as though some people have misinterpreted IPv6's required
   minimum MTU of 1280 as a required maximum.  Third, fragmentation in

FP: The "some people" is quite cryptic, in my opinion. What people? Does this
come from analyzing implementations? Then it would probably be good to state so
instead.

Francesca