Re: [DNSOP] update on draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor

Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Sat, 31 October 2015 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BF81B3CC4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qz7Yf1lf2Fei for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F10F1AC43C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by padhk11 with SMTP id hk11so108095306pad.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=sxzOYiN7IGoFjnwfIdPFkINEn+n8aN91rY1C1XdV/f4=; b=RS4K7rrgt5szqqYyPpzBN0mbgiZkbo8KICHK1i9QoL+Ciz+UCGFQ21jYiOYQsQlUZD kB9Fp/btN0luTp6qgQv1Nz/gnQTOwsWR3MSct3UIJGcpiAek69yfhDV/hwLT9bEeT7Ip tOtjCi6Ra7EjX+DUezEAHNHDjXsDDkOAjoOyUwu8zku4xyuNu+Qc9p2tKkBUycn3OVKj x0nz9TNUUd5eHjl73LmtbMDcxDFjlFUE11sNrTHam+XWhvoiZ/wcJ0FFEDisiqnJJb7e jrayHVhA4wVY0soli+3hzBlFf5rQU/4fCj3/CRr9aA3ruIBPR+x0QaZT9sLpjBqRmT9C oFSg==
X-Received: by 10.68.136.69 with SMTP id py5mr17377958pbb.94.1446329724705; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from t20010c4000003080240a1f0dc0a86d1a.v6.meeting.ietf94.jp (t20010c4000003080240a1f0dc0a86d1a.v6.meeting.ietf94.jp. [2001:c40:0:3080:240a:1f0d:c0a8:6d1a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ey2sm15559238pbd.77.2015.10.31.15.15.23 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <846193F8-1A47-4D21-97A4-DAF306920417@hopcount.ca>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:18:12 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0A33E9A3-86EB-4DBE-9697-B8EB933B3E26@gmail.com>
References: <846193F8-1A47-4D21-97A4-DAF306920417@hopcount.ca>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-y5DvlHcjm8zRkwHDseuWRK0ekE>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Nevil Brownlee <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] update on draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 22:15:26 -0000

Joe,

Thanks for the update.

Those of you who supported publication— I assume Joe will be reminding you to review :-)


best,
Suzanne

> On Oct 31, 2015, at 4:50 PM, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Just a clarification to the wg, since I think my earlier note on this was buried in some long thread -- the authors of draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor have taken it to the ISE and it has been accepted as a draft on the independent stream.
> 
> The next step in the process is for some people to review it. Please feel free to do that and send your opinions to rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org, ideally cc'ing the authors (directly or via this list) so that we know what is happening.
> 
> If there are changes proposed as part of the review we will follow up with edits and submit them, per the usual process.
> 
> Thanks all,
> 
> 
> Joe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop