[DNSOP] HTTPS and SVBC client support measurement.
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Fri, 10 July 2020 00:03 UTC
Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7869F3A09D3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 17:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c1IYEqpVRJWl for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 17:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90F313A09BE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 17:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 619D33AB19E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:03:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46023160087 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:03:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECB716007E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:03:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 7l_bAz9bcSZF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:03:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [1.0.0.3] (unknown [49.2.181.130]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B3FC16007D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:03:43 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
Message-Id: <F63A6D01-56C9-439A-A4B8-4855AC7F7E93@isc.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:03:38 +1000
To: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/08td6eLnJNnWIQm4HEY3CiJodVI>
Subject: [DNSOP] HTTPS and SVBC client support measurement.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:03:51 -0000
It would be useful if there was a way to measure client support for HTTPS and SVBC even when they are not in use. Perhaps a HTTP header could be added to signal that the client supports HTTPS? This will provide server administrators information about their client population to decide when it is safe to remove support for legacy clients. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
- [DNSOP] HTTPS and SVBC client support measurement. Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] HTTPS and SVBC client support measure… Ben Schwartz
- Re: [DNSOP] HTTPS and SVBC client support measure… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] HTTPS and SVBC client support measure… Ben Schwartz
- Re: [DNSOP] HTTPS and SVBC client support measure… Tommy Pauly