Re: [DNSOP] dnames, was My "toxic" remark at the mic today
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 07 November 2015 08:11 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5531E1A9064 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 00:11:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.663
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hHmSkY5M5ycc for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 00:11:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B3801A9051 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 00:11:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 4010 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2015 08:11:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 7 Nov 2015 08:11:50 -0000
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2015 08:11:27 -0000
Message-ID: <20151107081127.54940.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <846F82EC-E937-4275-9335-69FC7A96747A@hopcount.ca>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/0RfNikmuoC-uUQEfDRQY3dfFt0g>
Cc: jabley@hopcount.ca
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] dnames, was My "toxic" remark at the mic today
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2015 08:11:54 -0000
>carried out by João Damas to evaluate the behaviour of many different >code bases to a root zone that contained DNAME. The context of that work >was the potential solution to use DNAME in the root zone to provision >variant IDN TLDs (see ICANN board resolution 10 adopted on 12 March >2010), but the report was arguably general enough to be instructive in >this different context. The only gTLDs I'm aware of that are set up to be the same are .NGO and .ONG. They do it with paired zones, the same except for the DNSSEC keys. Are there any others? R's, John
- [DNSOP] My "toxic" remark at the mic today Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] My "toxic" remark at the mic today Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] My "toxic" remark at the mic today John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] My "toxic" remark at the mic today Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] My "toxic" remark at the mic today Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] My "toxic" remark at the mic today Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] My "toxic" remark at the mic today Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] My "toxic" remark at the mic today Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] dnames, was My "toxic" remark at the … John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] dnames, was My "toxic" remark at the … Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] dnames, was My "toxic" remark at the … John Levine