Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes-08.txt

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 16 November 2023 11:13 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81C5C14F75F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 03:13:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.404
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.404 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 508uouSHl-hd for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 03:13:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5199FC14F5E0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 03:13:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SWHTp5dJ0z30s for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:13:50 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1700133230; bh=ulUh41KeBu9F4yJtANHSt1CrWv0DAUk5rAPzr38XQbw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=DOwsIOmk5hmNAc16LITsXOMFo/cxCMC29rAMf4qoBSG+bgGoeWy67wFtXBSszOww2 PZiqMu++FCeMdGhA3ADr0yETwvrLHpwK6hN1/gEc1f2OzdkBuVTpxvpWBQ8osmo/6Z 4xKNXPzAd1h0aIu0qch+wtol1eu9VrsRyCoLdnBs=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ksM4N5mjzWYf for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:13:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:13:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A393310BEBDB; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 06:13:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B5010BEBDA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 06:13:48 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 06:13:48 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <169996260219.33611.6405129886775920165@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <5c529b73-07a8-3e81-c478-a3aaed8b9a23@nohats.ca>
References: <169996260219.33611.6405129886775920165@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/1DzEtYlPFJbyv6IHBZ5B195I9Q8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes-08.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:13:58 -0000

On Tue, 14 Nov 2023, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:

> Internet-Draft draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes-08.txt is now available.

Last time this came around I also suggested instead of n times QT
entries, to use the same method as NSEC does for conveying which RRtypes
are covered using a single bitmap:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3845#section-2.1.2

Paul