IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-v6ops-xie-network-happyeyeballs-00.txt

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 24 September 2018 23:31 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED7C130E60; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AxL_C4u9nRXD; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22f.google.com (mail-oi1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25B9313104E; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id k64-v6so51903oia.13; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=RmyfPwDL8s3uFd6cBlJGXDbzyAKPovzP01l4Vc5eghs=; b=GrtjgX3Sw9EgteXD/jNqHX2UnstEM/2wqqmSoUf9ovkMUnnIN5HXehNbr7mhy0ywuY 3bXRRGiMw/7gc9WG2WqKpZZc2QIEkC+kCwjF5PkORRTuz/zCUS+8UsmAWMnZ0BBwmpiv IclcKKvGhptMau+LOodl4AgD/UQtOQt2BB0YyIYXLqmDye5Pewr7jMhhYb3JSPSRR/k5 uainmsx/RXTCxajV/wAciuSc6Mo9oyBgZMSrm/ji+jhaYxWL/KlHm+WeEXaklF+JML12 ZYubQUMLL0eU6R0jBR0dca9tr3sqHlGgMTGuRu5rHf4yxqd5TzFw9HSgHkRTl8S0RBx1 Mciw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=RmyfPwDL8s3uFd6cBlJGXDbzyAKPovzP01l4Vc5eghs=; b=LdMd335zENMBRE6e0cbaS0jH6YDToqdBpjTxif3Tu7FfB/JzXUQcuosoL8PLfE9DdK 0E3U35s/e/IPfIQG/D73ZZjBYTKn+GHHTTGztxRw2or5I7p52BYvNcdcUpWl8Tu/btki twG1YAjN4ixTjm3txigFTDay2O33YJFojZpgH96AzGiTwPhF5UqvGnouKXCShKBHrK2S bnwqH1mN+7gzzBf3r5A+fbmFRxChnNb1d9s2/BNA/86E5MonYGSgwUpLFAE7uxjOwooW x2uyJukDiSnB1RW0A7+hzh/bDNAkSdZiTgK/l6zi7BORCcz3Exr6jC/wsWvV711+KXFB P8Yg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfojA0LaoLduz7GlmoMLIUHNTb1g5ul0uzlHuk4KiBTdnWF+JiRc3 4ugWFJ3E9/j/kituI7w+L5I=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV626+T4HsjUt5HT0rRvQ19zmJNMjGEKDVqnEpJQMXXXs4ON5rlVb7rGqpvo4BihW2E6xFjhk1g==
X-Received: by 2002:aca:50c1:: with SMTP id e184-v6mr37318oib.264.1537831863418; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:1546::107d? ([2600:8802:5600:1546::107d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x23-v6sm229873oie.0.2018.09.24.16.31.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <9532441E-1CA5-4106-ACF7-926F857B8DBF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0E203368-1FAF-453A-B71E-ADE7454546DD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:31:00 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqd4jjeZy9Stp-v6O0VOyvEJiE9vW1BLuy-wzqPGvDagoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Song Linjian <songlinjian@gmail.com>, v6ops@ietf.org, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
To: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
References: <153751052820.5339.10049404273601155140.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAObRXLWpXVbPyyxuzJH8osi+R1rdV8N8=Woqvq3UR9nk8kDaA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqd4jjeZy9Stp-v6O0VOyvEJiE9vW1BLuy-wzqPGvDagoQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/1EOGaZi3St6jrumMB-YBqLZ8TiM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-v6ops-xie-network-happyeyeballs-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 23:31:06 -0000


> On Sep 24, 2018, at 11:14 AM, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> wrote:
> 
> At Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:31:50 +0800,
> Davey Song <songlinjian@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I just submited a new draft intending to provide better connectivity from
> > network side function . Comments are welcome.
> 
> Some quick observations:
> 
> - I don't see why the intended status is Standards Track.  It seems to
>   be a document about an operational practice rather than a new
>   protocol feature.

I think we would have a charter problem as well. V6ops, per charter, can produce BCPs and informational documents.

> - In general, I wouldn't be excited about placing such complicated
>   functionality in the network rather than end hosts.  Sometimes it
>   may be justified as a least evil option, but the current description
>   of the draft didn't fully convince me
> 
> - I suspect the discussion on breaking DNSSEC is way too hand-waving.
>   In my general understanding it's generally not accepted at dnsop to
>   justify breaking DNSSEC just by saying "it's okay as validation at
>   end hosts is not typical".  Especially if it really intends to be
>   published as Standards Track I suspect some more detailed discussion
>   with a stronger justification will be needed.
> 
> --
> JINMEI, Tatuya
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war,
Defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
     Sun Tzu

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email