Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query-06: (with COMMENT)
Paul Wouters <pwouters@redhat.com> Wed, 17 February 2016 22:50 UTC
Return-Path: <pwouters@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C4E1A6FE1; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:50:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HWiF9P2INXft; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:50:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35C5B1B30B4; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:50:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA948C1F7C; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:50:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (vpn-229-132.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.229.132]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u1HMoRsl009463; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:50:28 -0500
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20160217183004.30227.34920.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Paul Wouters <pwouters@redhat.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <56C4F933.9010008@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:50:27 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160217183004.30227.34920.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/23zRDhgtvAiftuEktsfwbjlnGUY>
Cc: tjw.ietf@gmail.com, dnsop@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:50:47 -0000
On 02/17/2016 01:30 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- Section 6.3 -- > > It is RECOMMENDED that TCP sessions not immediately be closed after > the DNS answer to the first query is received. It is recommended to > use [TCP-KEEPALIVE]. > > A very tiny point: it strikes me that the 2119-level "RECOMMENDED" is on > the wrong half of this -- I think the 2119-level recommendation should be > on the TCP-KEEPALIVE part. I'd word it this way, but you can certainly > ignore this if you prefer, and no response is necessary: > > NEW > The use of [TCP-KEEPALIVE] on DNS TCP sessions is RECOMMENDED, and > thus TCP sessions should not immediately be closed after the DNS > answer to the first query is received. > END That seems like an improvement. I made the change. Paul
- [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Barry Leiba
- Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-i… Paul Wouters