[DNSOP] Time for WGLC?

Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Tue, 14 July 2020 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <bemasc@google.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA0B3A098D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aGDbS0GqyrNr for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D89493A0992 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id g75so7791431wme.5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uWkWnIxHYusykiZG0MugoLTCvRsmgiDgmFtwB/db4Lw=; b=Vs3XQzd1ZKZ+FzhTR660aIGThvhxAZIlvVpoUb4YcrG8WXBR8boq/pqNwGgWw/m60C KzS/hKp/O3zKuYdcfzFHSbv41C/+jHNZNzEhygLOT0w7o9OLMgGQn0VSYyxMUDm7GxCt OUirQ5Kkh30cu/iPzlaRdtEnE/nkFVBULqeIoar20XcPKtuzn1wwnVLE3cP+3qf3GTuQ CrjumrK66eCoAi4j2Z795hxyYZ1WhzyrBJLB/08Nfj4kxjFYPj5B0CK2mMHW389LEso/ UvUU/C3IhShHfoOkJh1Jmc2YkKJ4ggtPBtTdxQyQD9H4VKgeZ4xP7K+uNdukTjfrDlER rjtw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uWkWnIxHYusykiZG0MugoLTCvRsmgiDgmFtwB/db4Lw=; b=QJqOC+kE1h9sn1twbIQ3yvuwSJBp4EB/HO41jiiVD7sx+/9atloB5sWgS8/0IrDNOx tHP1ZL07ehCCUwH4gywIWpCPMxXLgrOquc4/guzxXjgHfuL44UfgX+Lv2Cf2xiQ/t6rq TFad5KoKoQbND2cZ5jjbnJBvrZ6B8HxIAQ7Mtjwt6fEnnxKfyll51Z40qG9DB84vhLbG tt0ZPlzngeM6zclVbh3+OkuifM3IG9akuk+sZe9FH2cfF/NugdMGgO7TBh5cBmpqfLAW L1zcJjac+5k5FlDSUSLf08xKgzZlqf3omjg4Uyj+A6oSbP3GPgW4isR4zoVTz6fX5W4N NGAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530GGbG4qrzd0Ua748BAoJt1KscS6qO8fuZIT8HWwCG6sTMbjDZq EeirKIqLGq7dWSLJXb96PX/2G/EQRkP9L0JZ32UXrl1Z
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1gYtyXjyo8buSRl+cqL13B/jl5HQv4ZizPUmzv5NYBCZ694op9Mr6H+JHsgPJs8ON4YXtBIH/LjES7549aWc=
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c3c7:: with SMTP id t7mr4865814wmj.97.1594750793637; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 14:19:42 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsD=OSN=iWtsGtjuekLAghctjEg59RRBhZRoT3S74WE07A@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="00000000000098568b05aa6ada6e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/43p64Alkg11accQKfqRNVh0Wj-Y>
Subject: [DNSOP] Time for WGLC?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 18:19:58 -0000

DNSOP chairs,

SVCB/HTTPS draft-01 has incorporated a lot of feedback, and I think it's
really in good shape (apart from "TODO REMOVE" sections).  There are
several implementations in development.  Is it time to start a WGLC?

--Ben