Re: [DNSOP] new EDE draft with a few changes
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Wed, 25 December 2019 15:36 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD20B1200CD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 07:36:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N5ai2ARPSLlx for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 07:36:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FFE8120018 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 07:36:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BD33121B4B; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 07:36:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Eric Orth <ericorth@google.com>
Cc: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <ybl36dh5ogq.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <CAMOjQcHECyrc1cyvev7zsCheXoU2YJjA2TKbrprywjHq6raA1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 07:36:55 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAMOjQcHECyrc1cyvev7zsCheXoU2YJjA2TKbrprywjHq6raA1g@mail.gmail.com> (Eric Orth's message of "Mon, 23 Dec 2019 15:39:42 -0500")
Message-ID: <ybleews4dt4.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5_PuqNMYl_BrgQweviKm5UTCOfg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] new EDE draft with a few changes
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 15:37:00 -0000
Eric Orth <ericorth@google.com> writes: > Regarding TC-bit: I would still prefer adding a sentence or two that error generators should keep > the EXTRA-TEXT field short to minimize the need for truncation. Seems reasonable. I'll need to go back and find your text since I don't remember it specifically. But I'll happily add it. > Regarding forwarding: Making it implementer-choice generally seems > good to me. But I am unsure what the current draft means by "properly > attributed". What is the proper way to attribute an EDE? Well, the wording there that we put is was designed to indicate you should somehow describe where you got the information from. But we're not prescribing how, since that's implementation dependent. Any suggested text you'd prefer? -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
- [DNSOP] new EDE draft with a few changes Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] new EDE draft with a few changes Eric Orth
- Re: [DNSOP] new EDE draft with a few changes Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] new EDE draft with a few changes Eric Orth
- Re: [DNSOP] new EDE draft with a few changes Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] new EDE draft with a few changes Eric Orth