Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-rebs-dnsop-svcb-dane in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

Magnus Sandberg <mem@fallback.netnod.se> Wed, 13 July 2022 08:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mem@fallback.netnod.se>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D34C15AD43 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 01:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BfGLM-1yHx-a for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 01:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.netnod.se (mail2.netnod.se [192.71.80.75]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DAB0C15AB6B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 01:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPV6:2a01:3f0:1:10::1008] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:10::1008]) (Authenticated sender: mem) by mail2.netnod.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09E2520000F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:01:27 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <f0be7da1-235f-b6f3-ec23-eaaf2c0048df@fallback.netnod.se>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:01:26 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <165763095573.4913.1293317417945204479@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Magnus Sandberg <mem@fallback.netnod.se>
In-Reply-To: <165763095573.4913.1293317417945204479@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/6EUCcS4yJNcAZDPITiTzMAL_E38>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-rebs-dnsop-svcb-dane in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 08:01:34 -0000

Hi,

I guess I found a typo in section 7.8 (DNS AliasMode)

Original text;

    Given a DNS server dns.example.com and records:

    _dns.dns.example.com. SVCB 0 dns.my-dns-host.net.
    dns.my-dns-host.net.  SVCB 1 . alpn=dot

    The TLSA QNAME is _853._tcp.ns1.my-dns-host.net.


Shouldn't the TSLA be;

    The TLSA QNAME is _853._tcp.DNS.my-dns-host.net.
                                ^^^

Regards,
// mem



Den 2022-07-12 kl. 15:02, skrev IETF Secretariat:
> 
> The DNSOP WG has placed draft-rebs-dnsop-svcb-dane in state
> Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Tim Wicinski)
> 
> The document is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rebs-dnsop-svcb-dane/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop