IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Mail addresses in .arpa

Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br> Sun, 08 April 2018 23:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rubensk@nic.br>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD81126B72 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 16:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.br
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Ct2E8-70CWj for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 16:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.br (mail.nic.br [IPv6:2001:12ff:0:4::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2581D120227 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 16:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nic.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B59C139D8B; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 20:46:52 -0300 (-03)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.nic.br
Authentication-Results: mail.nic.br (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.br
Received: from mail.nic.br ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.nic.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TmBI10Cp0Geu; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 20:46:50 -0300 (-03)
Received: from [192.168.1.81] (unknown [179.113.56.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: rubensk@nic.br) by mail.nic.br (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9A68139D76; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 20:46:49 -0300 (-03)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nic.br; s=dkim; t=1523231210; bh=sB+l08KzXtvasLseQsHGh8dREUy4H8HPJJ1HwcnmwcA=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:From; b=RBCl5LHY8EJzKxwKBQ75V5+vXuPEydVraUSZD99+T6s/O0RLRX67emCdXUiw/Gn4j VxbEFSBfXVuYOUYXMxhc3yMcQvSlJQvFYHDdblK+BD84mGaDeptMEggRyDuaXS1XfE TibfzrPIkj8Cz8aKRm15wtiWkaqv+A37K524ZLUY=
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br>
Message-Id: <99BB7FFF-D49A-44FE-87C7-B69791289491@nic.br>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8BCBE06C-13A2-4F56-845F-AC2D1F7437EC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 20:46:58 -0300
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1804081409150.21700@ary.qy>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
To: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1804081409150.21700@ary.qy>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 mail.nic.br E9A68139D76
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7tfDgMAg0Pd2TzghGwujlAjVk8E>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Mail addresses in .arpa
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 23:46:56 -0000

John,

Have you tried  sending e-mail from this address to Google, Microsoft and Zoho mail systems ?
(with SPF, please)


Rubens


> On 8 Apr 2018, at 15:14, John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
> 
> One day when I should have been doing something else, I make some .arpa e-mail addresses.
> 
> Try sending mail to johnl@m.183.57.64.in-addr.arpa and in all likelihood I will get it.
> 
> I know it's ugly, but is there any rule that forbids putting an MX in a reverse zone?
> 
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email