IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Prefixed name spaces and DANE client TLSA

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 22 January 2016 02:46 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027031B36A5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:46:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.664
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.664 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, KHOP_DYNAMIC=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gbE24RywGfge for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:46:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99B121B36A4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:46:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 33802 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2016 02:46:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 22 Jan 2016 02:46:27 -0000
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 02:46:05 -0000
Message-ID: <20160122024605.2841.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <m37fj6iu0a.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/89bLLeXu9s9EamvhbNkz6E8VR7A>
Cc: cloos@jhcloos.com
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Prefixed name spaces and DANE client TLSA
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 02:46:31 -0000

>There really is no need for _<proto>, and given that some higher-level
>protocols work over multiple protos, having a single TLSA is easier than
>having to have a bunch of CNAMEs.

Don't remember whether I responded to this, but in case I didn't, if
you want to make all of the _udp entries the same as _tcp, one DNAME
will do the trick.  I don't see this as a significant problem.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email