IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] warning

ac <ac@main.me> Mon, 19 December 2016 03:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ac@main.me>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C4D129460 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:37:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.791
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=main.me
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k6TwHyzDGimi for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:37:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web.hostacc.com (hostacc.com [188.40.114.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 531E71289B0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:37:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=main.me; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Message-ID:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=S/yLDdXKxDcK7b2Wx+Q8w8v4ryegGver1ZUMpBcm9N4=; b=KTCZItizbpJe7lfk0NWRgjvIHb iUnGwW39d0/VeZdIoMOpdPiazOqury6gDA8SbWPUiuCR5ekVD7dwRYRb/Z1pUzpGR/GCcuEgSnHHV aCsavlJBdnet06XvYsUlAh/X5c9PA/R6QokklkjKoNGWAK4dpSY03JHZP/eh0mz93GSp5shMD/hHi lNk4nEORTCQJSFJ6j05SyFDI2VHXUrSRnkbKg/kDQ5M2parNIAjhpnGS+R6aE0oi0mkzVYoJom2rR m0SY5UpJKpsHL3yXnbFl7XoI0yVbIxbMXdtLOWLq4tgzLNY7YYM8zlH4ZfuszopeBkHxXTP3P4hqn jom2JeQQ==;
Received: from [165.255.65.6] (port=39660 helo=tree.nuts.me) by web.hostacc.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <ac@main.me>) id 1cIol7-0000Dg-CR; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 04:37:05 +0100
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 05:36:32 +0200
From: ac <ac@main.me>
To: chinese.apricot@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CACfw2hj3sMTYUtEWjX6RH6rzaPpF3KvBzyMtrOviwqH9k_WftA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20161218051417.A61B6129B40@ietfa.amsl.com> <201612180759.uBI7xU3r028318@calcite.rhyolite.com> <20161218113535.593CB129436@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161218.132803.74728251.sthaug@nethelp.no> <423CF9AD-6DD9-4A73-85A3-8BECBC4339F4@rfc1035.com> <0660d148-8a88-f0c3-c9ed-64e20a28ac7d@gmail.com> <CACfw2hj3sMTYUtEWjX6RH6rzaPpF3KvBzyMtrOviwqH9k_WftA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: acmain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - web.hostacc.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - main.me
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: web.hostacc.com: authenticated_id: ac@main.me
X-Authenticated-Sender: web.hostacc.com: ac@main.me
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Message-Id: <20161219033708.531E71289B0@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8HxCImrn8R7Gc7yBbqqjjXrHUEI>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] warning
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 03:37:09 -0000

On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 10:45:57 -0800
william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com> wrote:

this became very relevant to DNSOP list again...

> SMTP configuration is not relevant... That said, the morphing of open
> SMTP services to the tightly controlled heirarchy and draconian
> locally administered rules which prevent delivery are EXACTLY what
> this draft proposes for the DNS.
> 
no, respectfully, you are completely wrong.

This draft is dishonest, (I am refraining from calling it criminal, but
criminal is probably not a wrong word)

When Mail server admins control which mail they receive, they are
exercising control over resources in their legal control.

When it is okay for DNS administrators to lie it simply is not okay.

We as a community is making it acceptable to tell lies by not calling a
spade a spade, but dancing around and using fancy footwork and using
long explanations to explain why this is perfectly acceptable. 

I also am fully aware that DNS admins are able to do what they want
without this draft.

BUT

That the IETF publishes this as an RFC is a clear indication that it
lacks ethics, promotes criminal behavior on the Internet (by making it
"okay" to tell lies)

And, are we really so far down the garden path that we cannot even see
that dishonesty breeds evil. It is the broken window principle. I can
of course also start quoting Edmund Burke (and again, that would not be
a wrong thing to do)

Andre

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status