Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-01
"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Sun, 17 July 2016 09:34 UTC
Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4258712D51C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l71AyUDTFeF5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52D4012D0B2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.179.49] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:64c7:480b:c16:843a]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 186CC22E3D; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 11:34:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
To: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 11:35:09 +0200
Message-ID: <91B26A1A-219A-4AE4-842C-240673F18C0B@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <1C455105-2C35-4A4B-B946-7801A334DF31@isoc.org>
References: <61745739-2B5B-444A-A711-67AE6432A307@sinodun.com> <C0EF83DA-4C45-45F0-9067-F30269189059@vpnc.org> <1C455105-2C35-4A4B-B946-7801A334DF31@isoc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_3E9B2571-F610-4D3C-A60A-FF8B9597081C_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6042)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/A0ht7Qv0yKVUKYx4tSEmXYpconM>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, John Dickinson <jad@sinodun.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-01
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 09:34:55 -0000
On 17 Jul 2016, at 11:16, Dan York wrote: > The new -01 draft looks good. I need to do a deeper read but I'll point out one additional term we found in the development of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-york-dnsop-deploying-dnssec-crypto-algs/ Not all registries accept DS. Some require DNSKEY. paf
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-00 Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-00 John Dickinson
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-01 Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-01 Dan York