Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: IDN
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 04 May 2015 15:16 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D14E1A1BEE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 May 2015 08:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sy7N1iHBMYMQ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 May 2015 08:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54EE01A1BDD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 May 2015 08:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-98-218.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.218]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t44FG9wB087460 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 May 2015 08:16:09 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-98-218.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.218] claimed to be [10.20.30.101]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <D6B46216-68E8-444B-88AD-AEE53CCE91B5@nic.br>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 08:16:10 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DBCB702B-E7ED-44FB-8DFA-B11FBA799BB0@vpnc.org>
References: <3FB18AE0-8769-4B73-9964-8F0D1AB1FA54@vpnc.org> <D6B46216-68E8-444B-88AD-AEE53CCE91B5@nic.br>
To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/B95YZDNMtuxSg9o7rUmlU940kyM>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: IDN
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 15:16:14 -0000
On May 4, 2015, at 8:11 AM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br> wrote: > I prefer changing "standard" to "current standard", since IDNA2008 use can be deprecated in favor of IDNA201x, like IDNA2008 replaced IDNA2003. As one of the primary authors of IDNA2003, and a minor author of IDNA2008, I agree. :-) --Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: IDN Andrew Sullivan
- [DNSOP] Terminology: IDN Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: IDN Rubens Kuhl
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: IDN Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: IDN Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: IDN Paul Hoffman