IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: [Int-area] draft charter for new DNS WG

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 02 November 2026 16:24 UTC

Received: from fhigh-b4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b4-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.155]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E33F46 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Nov 2026 16:24:41 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mx.ietf.org; dkim=pass header.d=fugue.com header.s=fm1 header.b=UTQ3wkea; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=Wb4bmmDH; spf=pass (mx.ietf.org: domain of mellon@fugue.com designates 202.12.124.155 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mellon@fugue.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=fugue.com
Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE72A7A00B8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2026 11:24:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from phl-frontend-04 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:24:35 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1793636675; x=1793723075; bh=P8a5AYeBT1 WjWq1jq/ONBrb7I+i6Jdox5S7tgEtG4HQ=; b=UTQ3wkeaehbVd9TWlLM7bP7jfN ZDdIWi/s4E0R8A6JNq4SPBvZF3vfVz8YH611EN7mVZ6eNURT2fR+XS4fboXbfpPK 2B/4mKHaOhTTjAom/gT52E0PNdNkQ25NPgU1OrIOEWGXBc+FMu7zO4MHkL9SJVWI QVLYODPQw3A/AFZdFckBvOIdA8nwDpfWPXCi1CgS1WPyk1McqJudnY7o6lz06uJt d42NLOtZX/cShe2Y8bpumu/JCUxvYgW3Ngo0XuTe8VrjzwMHtQHNp/y980oZ9wys CvpCRu8OzQFJyke7osbVtAwU4MEsyGkMapt1UKrpJLBEPdcw3U4JF58lbQXA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1793636675; x=1793723075; bh=P8a5AYeBT1WjWq1jq/ONBrb7I+i6Jdox5S7 tgEtG4HQ=; b=Wb4bmmDHpaIYhLqZ1l0IAcce2sxgOgw56X9qqcaWmEVEoeWZPNT a1ZMZb/A9XZC+VbPrAgQLPEhcN3LTlqgQnpOKHxcpAgOzdBG/8jFVVjsWZuBmqoc Am2z5+c4ridpoaRIZ9RBBDLjYKN5gHsPyretqdYrRCCNClceOn0LTd/FhrPUTs3m L7125AGIRo/vPXzsAHyDQfDxKEDU7nEkgqVH0njY+QIVOiFGwoYIncfdK3D0OLTO 62ypU4SMoCBBPkiJjcmtJ1oEieFid/EuMXou2jVXJriwHawhi4LB9IMWaOpt7z4t s7EJ0Al88Z7CM/+1NVtBsFpAqbokOpU0cyw==
X-DKIM2-Info: draft=ietf-dkim-dkim2-spec-08; repo=github.com/dkim2wg/interop; date=2026-10-28; sw=lmtpprox; action=sign d=fugue.com a=rsa-sha256;
DKIM2-Signature: i=1; m=1; t=1793636675; d=fugue.com; mf=PG1lbGxvbkBmdWd1ZS5jb20+; rt=PGRuc29wQGlldGYub3JnPg==; s=fm1:rsa-sha256:Wt030f908foMqoA3gLm3YTaH+Gwzb9Nc6KUVFbn+pmLqdw+ cQKVjF6aHjShhFsIgMt+UsdRiA5NVVYXZVZC7lnCtYb97mO3ZcqLAgAHVslhE3mp 2vkeO1HZgHHQjJsvN9dmHS2tO0Emgw868UZSAnAFuHTGEuLyEtRZLPyGp7TZLthl u0azfGrRztq9R2hzhp22Ew3Tvns22i4PdfsM3zRG7+ZWU3OxNO1JADpCmjVaFdJm HOog5VXSaVEcOG2yALSqDzObejMKx8IbcToHCeFS83wJBhTJDq/3Nn1d7OOR29Hk ZS+VJtbJx8WcD9DM7tHL60JDD9bfLHqqEv+/jlQ==;
X-DKIM2-Info: draft=ietf-dkim-dkim2-spec-08; repo=github.com/dkim2wg/interop; date=2026-10-28; sw=lmtpprox; action=mi-m=1; hc=11; hn=cc,content-type,date,feedback-id,from,in-reply-to,message-id, mime-version,references,subject,to;
Message-Instance: m=1; h=sha256:0Wf1XQB4GOqPelyt8ej5trcKWyeLQRwX+856hXctg9o=:E7N1sba4oIGazxr0dOzLX4egmDvABOhzui94EMethKU=;
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Q7noavpKB5iiT3lBQ5MXqs6Zn6ZsNOF_oyNFsRgh9YopYN37phzm5Q> <xme:Q7noajQ7hA6oV6Mv9rMpVxtyFhBCU5kID3Yw1poHby4ib0ri37cmyyGuqSQ4sQ7na 21pV93iWsNMjEBzh21XzFZ_3x_QIAMWZX0mHfWVSnivEIgXvcVI2Zic_w>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:Q7noasPkP1m2afpGY0hRImyECTA7fjHl40iSFg9i9eIID7kuInr7AfeAVI0BCzzVMxgfqbbDD1U7bAaKtxAlsGlgMGAYHYqsCbuIut7fhmE>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: dmFkZTE24I0aZZev5ttYxPRg8MpvILJwQoM4fd30GIqF0QxGf+Rr8zUR/dhyk5Hxw3lnbK y6LuKaOMSO/cuMxtAkkWzmbqjXLKaFNpy3WfLhCvjaMQhBStxbB/lhWyEdw8Vc95ETk6d6 iSRoCu28daRnqwSsPp2El/uriOj5ltGqPCFXf3QSO+4UzMgcj4BlagHcBzMm1+i86rfw0N 9PtlpT4FZ7ev+86Zjk0CCeAAZFdcLkl6KxaCKAwcHl/RwUKFIzDR6HHxLiw5004SLK3OBz j4OYaX2LPH3+mDbSa4sZZZOUc+DRWLwFsEKYbO7BTjpCdrczCfHcnNJFhxzFt0HsltF3Eh pnqrEIuRLydB9mcN3D8axbIlcncaZtfGNgmqn+6uyx+3s0ofiVSU9elAOBc0OvIOGxgevZ DpINpWUa4ugNYEGrdVeAiHU0yVnDVhQIhMKqAKWXRiA/KZ0PTGktcGAVZ+OR1AVW8S7Juk w3otKKWJBCpIls52a9oomx9SHfQHcTN5tv5NjU76PCQ6yR5fFNmJY9MNhiOO94fojC42NR JtRMGvIPQ/JvFHB5vB5XvRCnONaGawbONq1R/FcB45Ao+wr8p9GJxGyZKfmyRe/fITcunZ 1Ev/8TJY2jHoZHUszdEJzCzr9EMxTESL8GfCc3dQxNhwRskJeabdWdrTEAKg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Q7noamOh_ZkOnsEEfar_fIi0J2MDWLezMhv6s8nCvtU3Txu5zVuqXQ> <xmx:Q7noasssC_qBEfzsQRwLsR6SP7ankiTs6quIzr6RU55AO8Kvu4WJpQ> <xmx:Q7noagXwhUAomC-AeNdtIoYKXxOFNhKNhQ6jBRRkfjJCBjr54KSgog> <xmx:Q7noaksx2XNHEoyI_u3c3Kl1FuX3371lH8184Yo9w7uthmsehV8Orw> <xmx:Q7noaiRMa1IOQqQ-mAVPHl749xASUduf8LhfS1fqjeNPdkrHBemGljPf>
Feedback-ID: i1136489e:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 2 Nov 2026 11:24:34 -0500 (EST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <6B7C2806-9DB8-4AE9-B71B-48EABEEB79F4@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9802CBEF-0AF9-4C14-A739-1E44974094C2"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3901.300.26\))
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 17:24:22 +0100
In-Reply-To: <53442EFD-3F8F-43B9-A635-D4549D727136@rfc1035.com>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
References: <D8883F08-769B-4218-B96A-E74D2F9F4E9F@rfc1035.com> <F72EC828-DFF3-465D-8B95-EC3D00D2D660@fugue.com> <A7BB82B3-44B8-4362-996D-17305608E552@rfc1035.com> <CC20D476-A32F-49DE-A866-FE5031517C50@fugue.com> <53442EFD-3F8F-43B9-A635-D4549D727136@rfc1035.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3901.300.26)
X-Spamd-Bar: ------------------------
Message-ID-Hash: XVIE72H4OX5ICKQG3QUV2E5RDSVLWMJQ
X-Message-ID-Hash: XVIE72H4OX5ICKQG3QUV2E5RDSVLWMJQ
X-MailFrom: mellon@fugue.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Working Group DNSOP <dnsop@ietf.org>, int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: [Int-area] draft charter for new DNS WG
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/BnJRAs25TOuv8fAO5_4yMLc8SgE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

On 2 Nov 2026, at 17:00, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
> Ugh! IMO, those sorts of shopping lists are unhelpful in a WG charter. How long would these lists need to be and where/how would they stop? How realistic would it be to expect the whole IETF or WG to converge on a consensus on those rhetorical questions? Is that a productive use of everyone's time? Says me asking further rhetorical questions.... :-)

The reason I ask is that I do a fair amount of work in the DNSSD working group, and I'm curious as to whether we now have to bring all this work to the DNS working group to be ratified if it now has change control on code point allocations.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status