Re: [DNSOP] Enough latency obsession Re: Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-00

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 22 December 2014 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466BF1A8F48 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 06:28:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BT6v3XSJXLEq for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 06:28:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C613C1A8F45 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 06:28:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E4CB2802C7; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:28:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BCA2802BC; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:28:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1193B38038; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:28:24 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:28:24 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <20141222142824.GA6271@nic.fr>
References: <20141216152511.GA22255@totoro.home.mukund.org> <20141216171318.GA23468@totoro.home.mukund.org> <549069CC.20309@redbarn.org> <EE59F273-8E3F-4F0E-A3AA-B8256DE5B3BD@icsi.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <EE59F273-8E3F-4F0E-A3AA-B8256DE5B3BD@icsi.berkeley.edu>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 8.0
X-Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/BvdVE5Lxf69JUhITjJs-HgRGyuQ
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org>, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Enough latency obsession Re: Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:28:58 -0000

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 02:44:40PM -0500,
 Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu> wrote 
 a message of 34 lines which said:

> DNS doesn't exist in a vacuum, but then goes to at minimum, a TCP
> handshake, and who knows what else beyond it.

But other people are obsessed, too. The TCP guys published RFC
7413. And the TLD crowd designed session resumption, to reduce
latency.