[DNSOP] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-22

Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 14 March 2023 13:14 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: art@ietf.org
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <167879967990.62196.14342409672612256893@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 06:14:39 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/CEmicB-3tFjGD1RDqez2MgPaZ1o>
Subject: [DNSOP] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-22

Reviewer: Barry Leiba
Review result: Ready

Thanks for a clear, concise, and, if I may say, valuable document.  I couldn't
even find any typos.

I have two very minor comments, both of which can be ignored if you prefer:

1. In Section 4, you use "somename.alt" -- was that chosen over "example.alt"
for a particular reason?  If so, carry on.  If not, maybe consider switching?

2. I would promote RFC 8244 to a normative reference.  I realize that one can
make a reasonable argument both ways, so no big thing either way.

--
Barry

[DNSOP] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-dns… Barry Leiba via Datatracker