IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] I'm an idiot -- draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Thu, 03 October 2019 15:05 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C39120143 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 08:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sv5rAyLae9Zq for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 08:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5226120913 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 08:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id l3so4060669qtr.4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 08:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ag1SxOe8fHzl02WlAZjhEtZmViFKHwbnezoNwtHFWPE=; b=xVu/NEFOxEGTfBFe86fSh5ABrP79+bw5nv3n8jRjNMb8GLh8NvgJXtbK3bp4I6NaRd tZbM73lTal7J9mOX8rAux2hvTKAHYYCgP81Hv31yMFLqAw4Iz1JNroqBQudQLEIyN6ok 9WiNj68khSx7kRMuPc811xWk+oSWiZu6CIIKLo3FshcTksvMDkSO99eTTNOt/SS36hQ8 G7R2kNP5V54NZvrU3jIq08iZE1rnkNEFrZHVS+/pR0j9gh3Z61SO3HKNlKpSh/VQNeBh mpvEgo9Q46nEr1tDdXN0pjSGuTlsFp43JpzYGzWF0fo0mwKWotnXX1JLnoAbwqkARBaJ knrg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ag1SxOe8fHzl02WlAZjhEtZmViFKHwbnezoNwtHFWPE=; b=Ti3R3lDSsH13tNdgNyPWFoXqOIyRY5idXZx1M9DsrVos6Y3satDmZUq1GbbF57SkxT YNDXkYB4NzMSMzramj3MdtJHGYKfh0Vux4EvuAU6l/2Lbcxck2LhMlxJhYKkvkKMln0X pBRcJKwY3nJOffVxH8xY9aTw+XNaXiVRwQWPhIeogNw9k/VCCMMjjY/6oBoqKpjD460l 2kSy467DmNKGbFwz7Bw8Oh0NV+KoAbVI5ThON4uuMEeQJKhgWQ0HzCeAUJL3FKj+27hw 8rp1mL7UjduzSoFHkktDSrR76srOIisi6qRGKyC+G+4u0yDlNWInlsDg6nnH1tMlRbYx UdTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVEQdmBML+n7prlo1mctpUJXC/2LQUO5uJt85KWTQjJDYHJL9Lt tAaxNCB6/pO4lzgJJosql0XO/7RKnoBJ/Xxo/44B9JwgCgc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxr2LmDLFM+ldciqMSjtizKNDhp3P95iYFxjJfy+tqIyUrT7vTflqvL3MIuteILB/LRCknivv4MKjyFoOBr3mc=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:fb07:: with SMTP id c7mr8666311qvp.29.1570115137076; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 08:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 11:05:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_i+vTa0ut-L8Ca9OG8bkuRs3A4oY1wF-1GsSvKoqhC7rKg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@isc.org>, Dan Mahoney <dmahoney@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DHJR2OyvhPhJZQ5li_RpbC5zMpA>
Subject: [DNSOP] I'm an idiot -- draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 15:05:48 -0000

Hi there all,

To obsolete DLV I was using the Option 2 of the "Designating RFCs as
Historic" process - this involves copying the text of the supporting
draft into the "status-change" document, and then making the
supporting draft as Dead.

Unfortunately I missed something obvious --
draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv also updates RFC 6698 and RFC 6840; by
copying the text into the status-change document, there is nothing
left to actually *do* the updates. So, with apologies to the authors /
WG, can you please resubmit draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv with:
1: RFC 6698, RFC 6840 listed in the "Updates" header
2: Update the abstract to say "This document updates RFC 6698 by
excluding the DLV resource record from certificates, and updates RFC
6840 by excluding the DLV registries from the  trust anchor
selection." (or something similar)
3: Marking this as Std Track (we are updating Std Track RFCs)

I will then redo the IETF LC (because we moved from Informational to Std Track).

Sorry for not catching this (and thanks to Alvaro for noticing it),
W

-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email