Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-perreault-dnsop-stats-mib-00.txt
Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Wed, 02 May 2012 11:34 UTC
Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6696C21F8AF4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2012 04:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ca6QOrapV+Kf for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2012 04:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D67821F8AEB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2012 04:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (modemcable010.192-131-66.mc.videotron.ca [66.131.192.10]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96F7F41364 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2012 07:34:41 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4FA11BCD.8020808@viagenie.ca>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 07:34:37 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20120424124644.4369.15665.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20120502110204.GA21826@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20120502110204.GA21826@nic.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-perreault-dnsop-stats-mib-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 11:34:46 -0000
On 2012-05-02 07:02, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > A mention of RFC 3197, and an explicit answer to the questions it > raises, seems necessary to me. Will be added in the next revision. It will be along the lines of "what we're doing is much more simple and focused". This MIB is about simple read-only counters of which many servers already provide at least a subset, and for which home-grown bindings into SNMP agents (using Perl scripts and such) already exist in various forms. So to some extent we're standardizing existing practice, which wasn't the case for RFCs 1611 and 1612. And there are already plans and preliminary code for such a DNS MIB in Bind 10. Simon -- NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca vCard 4.0 --> http://www.vcarddav.org
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-perreault-dnsop-sta… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-perreault-dnsop-sta… Simon Perreault