Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp-05: (with COMMENT)
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Wed, 19 October 2022 17:51 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4353C1522B6; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x0PpDGr8zPug; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa4.dc.icann.org (ppa4.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34918C14F74C; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.6]) by ppa4.dc.icann.org (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTPS id 29JHoltB012072 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:50:47 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.12; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:50:46 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.1118.012; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:50:46 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp@ietf.org>, DNSOP Chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp-05: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHY4grDbv7/5ZktvEqVQeqZIWfiaa4Wd+OA
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:50:46 +0000
Message-ID: <7FDFA50F-CE48-47FD-BBBE-DF83AD0E7EDC@icann.org>
References: <166599888167.24452.4745887430444145489@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <166599888167.24452.4745887430444145489@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: True
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_25EA44D8-8A10-401F-8D38-8EDFBE995C53"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.545,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-10-19_11,2022-10-19_04,2022-06-22_01
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DvMUikuqnpmNwRO46s0zfpYpW54>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:51:49 -0000
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > More generally, out of scope for this work, it would be nice to an updated > document describing all the core aspects of DNS, that would probably be helpful > to the wider community. I appreciate that such an undertaking would be a > significant amount of less appealing work though ... This has been discussed repeatedly, and we have walked away from it. The sad experience with RFC 6071 makes me think that such documents are possible to write but end up with very little value. (Disclaimer: I was WG chair for that one...) --Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-iet… Robert Wilton via Datatracker
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Robert Wilton's No Objection on… Paul Hoffman