Re: [DNSOP] Changes to Charter

[joel jaeggli <[e-mail]>]

On 3/25/14, 8:39 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/24/14, 1:48 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
>> On 3/19/14, 12:42 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>>>
>>> 5. Address possible minor changes or extensions to the DNS Protocol,
>>> initially with a focus on the operational impacts of these changes. Act
>>> as clearinghouse or providing advice to ADs and other WGs on EDNS0
>>> options, new RRTYPEs, record synthesis, or other mechanics of  extending
>>> DNS to support other applications.
>>
>> I fell like this is intended to allow work on issues related to the
>> root/tld registration but without being explicit. I'm a little on the
>> fence with respect to how explicit we want to but I think we should
>> actually call it out.
>>
> 
> We were trying to be explicitly vague, or vaguely explicit.  I was
> thinking we could say something like "such as root/tld conflicts or
> namespace or application space conflicts".
> 

if I had to channel my other colleagues on the IESG it's probably
important enough to warrant it's own bullet. I will ultimately get my
own chance to whittle at the text so it's just a suggestion.