IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dnsop-xpf-00.txt

Robert Edmonds <edmonds@mycre.ws> Fri, 06 January 2017 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <edmonds@mycre.ws>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DA1129496 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:01:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SM03GRaV-CfQ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:01:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mycre.ws (mycre.ws [45.33.102.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8277B128824 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:01:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by chase.mycre.ws (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C5BF412C0DC4; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:01:10 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:01:10 -0500
From: Robert Edmonds <edmonds@mycre.ws>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@isc.org>
Message-ID: <20170106180110.fb2yw7kdmqa3kjkm@mycre.ws>
References: <148371232017.17418.17291340320637379369.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <dab36e0b-81a5-e9cc-0a07-416061ce9b74@isc.org> <20170106172822.cr3zbf22efhm2wga@mycre.ws> <78ac6d5c-712a-8ef6-e0e0-dc1341645b9a@isc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <78ac6d5c-712a-8ef6-e0e0-dc1341645b9a@isc.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/F8YH7V4-TWq0gmT_L7GhSZjVYJQ>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dnsop-xpf-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 18:01:12 -0000

Ray Bellis wrote:
> Yes, that seems like a reasonable suggestion, although it would be a
> shame to have to rev the doc if another IP version should even happen to
> be introduced in the future...

It can be rev'd in the same document that introduces a DNS address RR
for that address family :-)

-- 
Robert Edmonds

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email