Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-04.txt
Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> Wed, 13 September 2017 09:31 UTC
Return-Path: <sara@sinodun.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E70132F2C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 02:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id arLB3GXgXD60 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 02:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haggis.mythic-beasts.com (haggis.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:86:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ED2D1321A7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 02:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2001:b98:204:102:fffa::1b] (port=62849) by haggis.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <sara@sinodun.com>) id 1ds40o-0002vP-El for dnsop@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 10:31:14 +0100
From: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 10:31:12 +0100
References: <150529490877.30471.1398903711764491836@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <150529490877.30471.1398903711764491836@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-Id: <589151E0-B652-4929-830E-3F10969B81D5@sinodun.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/FGnmoE5NuwDX5Cafr9-56A-XmSo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:31:18 -0000
Hi All, Based on the discussions at IETF 99 and on the list this update to the draft makes a number of changes: * The Title of the draft has been changed to ‘DNS Stateful Operations’ (DSO) to reflect the fact that the TLV format is not limited to being used for signalling * The draft now updates RFC1035 * The term 'DSO session’ is used throughout for clarity * A paragraph has been added to the Introduction to discuss the use of a new format * Several terms in the Terminology section have been updated and some new ones added * Clarified the use of the words timer and timeout throughout the document * A short discussion section has been added with specific use cases * The specific mention of QUIC has been removed, the text now just describe the properties of the transport used for DSO. * The text has been updated to specify that messages must be processed in the order they were sent (not received) * A modifier Encrypted Padding TLV has been added to support padding of encrypted queries * The text describing the behaviour of middle-boxes has been updated * The set of RCODES defined in the document has been extended * Responses to DSO messages are now optional: An Acknowledgement bit has been added to the DSO data format which specifies if the DSO message requires an acknowledgement response * A section has been added to specify exactly what a client should to with the timers/timeouts when receiving a Keepalive TLV * The section on Connection sharing is now consistent with RFC7766 Regards Sara. > On 13 Sep 2017, at 10:28, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. > > Title : DNS Stateful Operations > Authors : Ray Bellis > Stuart Cheshire > John Dickinson > Sara Dickinson > Allison Mankin > Tom Pusateri > Filename : draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-04.txt > Pages : 32 > Date : 2017-09-13 > > Abstract: > This document defines a new DNS Stateful Operation OPCODE used to > communicate operations within persistent stateful sessions, expressed > using type-length-value (TLV) syntax, and defines an initial set of > TLVs used to manage session timeouts and termination. This mechanism > is intended to reduce the overhead of existing "per-packet" signaling > mechanisms with "per-message" semantics as well as defining new > stateful operations not defined in EDNS(0). > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-04 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-04 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-04 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
- [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-session-sign… internet-drafts
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-session-… Sara Dickinson