Re: [DNSOP] draft-mglt-dnsop-search-list-processing-00.txt
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 07 May 2014 10:37 UTC
Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116DE1A0693 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 03:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_I_LETTER=-2, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yejaoj2s0YhC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 03:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0601C1A064E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2014 03:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EA64280553; Wed, 7 May 2014 12:37:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F1B280551; Wed, 7 May 2014 12:37:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08959B38038; Wed, 7 May 2014 12:36:40 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 12:36:40 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20140507103639.GA28674@nic.fr>
References: <CADZyTkn2Wau99zfQR+jjwHVr4Jnq3Eo=Ht+OEScbvKBLc=7e2w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTkn2Wau99zfQR+jjwHVr4Jnq3Eo=Ht+OEScbvKBLc=7e2w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux jessie/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/FyrjpjTQvdrihHFS-5YKoWM6_dI
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-mglt-dnsop-search-list-processing-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 10:37:17 -0000
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:41:10PM +0200, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> wrote a message of 63 lines which said: > Please find draft-mglt-dnsop-search-list-processing-00.txt [1] > a single label that is 63 characters or less, starts with a letter, > ends with a letter or digit, and has as interior characters only > letters, digits, and hyphen as defined by [RFC1035]. Why this restriction, which is *not* in RFC 1035. "_tcp" is not a single label? > In addition, fall backs resolution between these two categories will > happen and MUST be address by administrator before any new gTLD. It seems to be a policy decision and not suitable for a RFC. > For Unqualified Domain Names, the resolver MUST proceed to the > resolution using search list. If the resolution fails, returning a > NXDOMAIN, no attempt SHOULD be done to resolve it as an Qualified > Domain Name. The second sentence is a protocol change and should not be done lightly. Frankly, I see no reason to forbid single-label domain names to work. (Whatever ICANN may say.) > This section provides a small command line that tests which TLD has > an A or a AAAA RRset. May be a mention of RFC 7085 here? It has a similar script and similar results.
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-mglt-dnsop-search-list-processi… Daniel Migault
- [DNSOP] draft-mglt-dnsop-search-list-processing-0… Daniel Migault
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-mglt-dnsop-search-list-processi… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-mglt-dnsop-search-list-processi… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-mglt-dnsop-search-list-processi… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-mglt-dnsop-search-list-processi… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-mglt-dnsop-search-list-processi… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-mglt-dnsop-search-list-processi… Stephane Bortzmeyer