Re: [DNSOP] Soliciting feedback for draft-kristoff-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 21 October 2016 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67B5129614 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0M0WuWxBoMjK for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5B521294B6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.83] (50-1-99-230.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.230]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u9LFk4L2055705 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:46:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-99-230.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.230] claimed to be [10.32.60.83]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: jtk@aharp.iorc.depaul.edu
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:46:04 -0700
Message-ID: <B76AB14F-9BA8-4D35-A7B6-BC4D18BD7A5E@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20161016102240.2c4353d4@p50.localdomain>
References: <20161016102240.2c4353d4@p50.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5263)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/GRinRplSHrvhocDbL0eMDKWINhs>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Soliciting feedback for draft-kristoff-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:46:09 -0000

On 16 Oct 2016, at 8:22, John Kristoff wrote:

> If I could trouble you to consider reviewing this and provide any
> comments you might have about it, that would be appreciated.  Thank 
> you.
>
>   DNS Transport over TCP - Operational Requirements
>   <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kristoff-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-01>
>
> Abstract
>
>    This document encourages the practice of permitting DNS messages to
>    be carried over TCP on the Internet.  It also describes some of the
>    consequences of this behavior and the potential operational issues
>    that can arise when this best common practice is not applied.

The document is well-written and a fairly neutral history of TCP use in 
DNS, but I don't see any of what I would call "requirements". Section 3 
is a discussion, not a list of requirements.

If this document has some concrete requirements (along with the history 
that is there), I would support this as a WG document.

--Paul Hoffman