IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] relax the requirement for PTR records?

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Thu, 14 May 2015 04:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFE91B3310 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2015 21:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.498
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kx80Mvu9e5Cq for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2015 21:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 63AD41B330F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2015 21:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 42139 invoked from network); 14 May 2015 03:57:14 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 14 May 2015 03:57:14 -0000
Message-ID: <55542053.5000603@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 13:10:59 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <D178DCF2.B1766%Lee@asgard.org>
In-Reply-To: <D178DCF2.B1766%Lee@asgard.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/JkYSACbnTWTqlj_dnKqWyz5RvUI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] relax the requirement for PTR records?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 04:11:32 -0000

Lee Howard wrote:

> (I think we generally agree that PTRs for servers are good).
> 
> Is there consensus now that ISPs don't need to provide PTRs for their
> customers?

You are effectively saying that ISPs can forbid their customers
run good servers.

						Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email