Re: [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: (with COMMENT)
"Mirja Kühlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 10 October 2018 12:43 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E06130EF2; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 05:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uXLLHwR1E5eU; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 05:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2EE6130EC8; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 05:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 200116b82c6c6800f41b92e90a84e3fe.dip.versatel-1u1.de ([2001:16b8:2c6c:6800:f41b:92e9:a84:e3fe]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1gADpZ-00069C-P0; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:43:13 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: "\"Mirja Kühlewind (IETF)\"" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <904d0d58-855d-b29e-85f3-aa62df038608@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:43:10 +0200
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, benno@NLnetLabs.nl, dnsop@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B2B34CE0-A333-4CDB-A69B-670953DAD4CB@kuehlewind.net>
References: <153917078604.5800.5418889094650485301.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <904d0d58-855d-b29e-85f3-aa62df038608@dcrocker.net>
To: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1539175397;da3dfffc;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1gADpZ-00069C-P0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KjaWiutvEojaswhV8BfCqia-ncg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 12:43:20 -0000
Hi Dave, no I didn’t see that mail (quite a bit behind mail at the moment) but looked it up now. I have to say the argument of have a clean registry doc is not that convincing for me but it this fine. However re-consider the appropriate intended status for this doc! Mirja > Am 10.10.2018 um 13:52 schrieb Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>: > > On 10/10/2018 7:26 AM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote: >> I don't quite understand why it was seen as beneficial by the group that this >> doc has been split up, > > > Did you see the note I posted yesterday about this (in the context of having the base refer to the -fix, but including an explanation for the split)? > > d/ > > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net >
- [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-i… Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Mirja Kühlewind (IETF)
- Re: [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Dave Crocker