Re: [DNSOP] On draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis and obsoleting RFC 6304

Hi Paul,

 	Thanks for the update.  There's a newer draft circulating between 
myself and Joe which captures your point.  The additional word-smithing is 
appreciated.

On Sun, 30 Nov 2014, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> Greetings again. draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis obsoletes RFC 6304, therefore it should not be indicating that the reader should be familiar with RFC 6304. However, the text confuses this in a few ways.
>
>   RFC6304 described the steps required to install a new AS112 node, and
>   offered advice relating to such a node's operation.  This document
>   updates that advice to facilitate the addition and removal of zones
>   for which query traffic will be sunk at AS112 nodes, using DNAME,
>   whilst still supporting direct delegations to AS112 name servers.
>
> This document doesn't "update that advice", it replaces it.
>
>   [RFC6304] describes an approach whereby zones whose traffic should be
>   directed towards an AS112 sink should be directly delegated to AS112
>   name servers.  Correspondingly, each AS112 node is manually
>   configured to answer appropriately for those zones.
>
>   The guidance in this document preserves this capability for the zones
>   that were originally delegated in this fashion.  AS112 nodes that
>   were implemented in accordance with the guidance in [RFC6304] will
>   continue to provide service for those zones.
>
> This should be "This document describes an approach..." and "...with the guidance in this document will..."
>
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

wfms