[DNSOP] Éric Vyncke's Abstain on charter-ietf-dnsop-04-03: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 21 July 2025 10:14 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <175309284702.1658500.16442938187879714340@dt-datatracker-7ff4b97469-cdtd8>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 03:14:07 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: 7D4O5T7LAJCM7OZF5ITJAWQAYWFRVXQG
CC: dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Subject: [DNSOP] Éric Vyncke's Abstain on charter-ietf-dnsop-04-03: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/NEuQ3OlX_nhfItoGhkoAl8TuSl8>

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-dnsop-04-03: Abstain

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dnsop/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Changing my ballot from BLOCK to ABSTAIN as I do not want to block the
re-chartering on a small (albeit important) point, see below a non-addressed
BLOCK point. My previous other BLOCK point about the WG scope being vague has
been addressed.

Previous BLOCK point `As a WG charter needs to be well scoped, please add the
intended publication status for all work items, e.g., standard track for
protocol extensions and informational (or BCP) for operational guidance.`

[DNSOP] Éric Vyncke's Abstain on charter-ietf-dns… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker