IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: QNAME

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Mon, 18 December 2017 19:12 UTC

Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB19712D838 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:12:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VtVUbpVUd8yv for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:12:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x231.google.com (mail-pg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8D4812D80F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:12:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id q67so298458pga.9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:12:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Q6sXv5IjSMehRtF30XGxGt9vIOnJJGKfnHgLREk8HKg=; b=hJapmEph5CIJZkPy93B0zhF2SGcqm/BIVPl+Wy42hOaRtWfjSrsO1vWMAnVOIvMwrJ Y7CvApXV7LxOIS0jJf52b0U2SrtMpT05LUOjwjGzPfqYe5Yy3JDOw8ZscaktFGp2EcCi DyWBtYnbhtGcC8VlGjG1ANiAPso537V05KHCKJUzCICC5opVuZihrxAMJowpnbLgh/yl 2qRQjbvswRG5SdficcLpS1fb4vA5v/eyJpumyzLUFNOUQeACradFYkcTA2f7oJSUPKR+ bMcPxhrFBoOzU4YoVE8Dtydwzs2AUN09HgZorHKKL5ySiaJBlSZtefvPr5wyyPGAPBgl k68Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q6sXv5IjSMehRtF30XGxGt9vIOnJJGKfnHgLREk8HKg=; b=son/wERwI8Tus3nOKOMFrAZWfwdoW+5+yhpKG8qioyRudtsIGis/yhSF5XKYZpJx0h ujRYZefVKiOAGmaftldFbmdFCCgKTO4KsD3ugrgbMM12p7SQyIkGM2ZCZWDtMpxpgCo7 VRZjPXeo6Z82dIVVzR/UsrUN4mKqfTr1/i/fjOdUTG1yZMMqsDnkPeDu4IX28HA9vIwm e43QpWCHSy1nWw6Z8LaaXNdWlMPrFlv0zC7wrstlCqaQYxUrsnocvfFfapVqJMB6GMz5 n0W8K77Cv5A9fCB1bIn7wWP5lLaPrrhFhxjw08lQgr6x3D01XFCWI7HzBRAf+VQJF73z KnNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mL/Er1rxCrMikfP0lFOt7OO05FCXrW05s7Kfju4cjYF241Imv1q /IPxIPlgi3QfRjDY/hvS0ljw2E/p/jLnvwzZqFB6jKcc
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovXtZysRrbG8q7E8qDsBkr1PYky9jjiKdiODGkHBWvvKiuE6Ht5RyG1SKvWWgLuNGfHbqunBrnlFf+B3arfRFQ=
X-Received: by 10.98.19.202 with SMTP id 71mr663587pft.181.1513624370342; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:12:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.139.5 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:12:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5A381173.5000906@redbarn.org>
References: <F8509291-AAA0-49FC-BF84-21C3ECAF9813@vpnc.org> <20171218131223.yfu5ntzdyjivlnzi@nic.fr> <5A381173.5000906@redbarn.org>
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:12:49 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8A-Nkah3MMj6H3gETqeaKA2dsA5wVD4ZQkPjN-xHTw14Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11459990eafd760560a22256"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/NSZylCqBC4PEc1g4PMjXcVyMG6E>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: QNAME
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 19:12:53 -0000

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> wrote:

>
>
> Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
>> As I mentioned in this errata
>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4983>, I think RFC 2308 was
>> wrong in redefining QNAME. My personal preference would be to change
>> the second paragraph to "RFC 2308 proposed another definition,
>> different from the original one. Since it is actually a different
>> concept, it would be better to find another name for it. Here, QNAME
>> retains the original definition of RFC 1034."
>>
>
> +1.
>
> --
> P Vixie
>


+1

-- 
Bob Harold

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email