IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: London issues.

Lars-Johan Liman <liman@autonomica.se> Tue, 07 August 2001 10:42 UTC

Received: from nic.cafax.se (nic.cafax.se [192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA29960 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 06:42:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nic.cafax.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta13/8.12.0.Beta13) with ESMTP id f77AMNBe023858 for <dnsop-outgoing@nic.cafax.se>; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 12:22:23 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta13/8.12.0.Beta13) id f77AMNaR023857 for dnsop-outgoing; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 12:22:23 +0200 (MEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: nic.cafax.se: majordom set sender to owner-dnsop@cafax.se using -f
Received: from naptop.autonomica.se (host217-33-147-140.ietf.ignite.net [217.33.147.140]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta13/8.12.0.Beta13) with ESMTP id f77AMNBe023852 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 12:22:23 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by naptop.autonomica.se (8.12.0.Beta1/8.12.0.Beta1) with ESMTP id f77AMJvT006633; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:22:19 +0100 (WEST)
To: dcrocker@brandenburg.com
Cc: dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: London issues.
From: Lars-Johan Liman <liman@autonomica.se>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010806135947.04481ce8@brandenburg.com>
References: <20010627144911F.liman@autonomica.se> <5.1.0.14.2.20010806135947.04481ce8@brandenburg.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.6 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20010807112219Z.liman@autonomica.se>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 11:22:19 +0100
X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130)
Lines: 18
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

dcrocker@brandenburg.com:
> This is about a document NOT on your list.  That might mean it is
> not possible to consider it at this time.  Further, it might be
> assessed as out of scope for the group.

I can see little harm in presenting a new document, and hear what the
audience thinks of it. Since it's new, there is little chance that
will advance it in a drastic way, so people will have time to comment
it on the list as well.

I'll put you at the end, if that's OK. (It seems like something that
_might_ generate discussion, and I like to have those points at the
end.)

Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. :-(

				Cheers,
				  /Liman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email