IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft new charter: add stub resolvers?

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Tue, 08 April 2014 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644EA1A0433 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 07:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5G4XLHAz9-An for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 07:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x231.google.com (mail-ie0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F40D1A0429 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 07:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id rl12so988299iec.22 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 07:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=U2maAaRjsewolr2KlpXknQezOE6sqAqxyJ90TYrN9+I=; b=MwAAabJPM3w+qskX6R6GzdLT2AVUScAWaEHFnCaYFcHgQoblC/+YN+ItJWcuqcVVn4 RyP7pnQYCJvluNtBbCV9kZmUGjByNLyXvBGlbWkIYq1nPsLoTzHwBURBThoTRQXWwKRf nxUZLbyEo6oDepGeUMHd6NJwegDsFlVu1GMz8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=U2maAaRjsewolr2KlpXknQezOE6sqAqxyJ90TYrN9+I=; b=ltx9S5KrK4HlL7jW9HhnTWDS0dy3BAM2aORm0qJNb44StmSlCzouL3GmcAaaysE/D4 PvGzm6OJ37ngw/RgLjvaD0/yWeoNjcllPZeBN9zoV5lmlH7cHqVisk0hClExSLlAhLWN Muvy9urANgldwgzeeZysUwEeOytrWO4nA/a7Yx2tqKF74P5DW5UscCe7qSbNAyyQMXsM YH0hrajJrS31r2vNXfdOtFalsFtY5ggj8PDUcuGGUVDtwZReIDsd5LPxGlA+LxF0SqVr vi0cqr0bS65Afd98VwtWpOQq8jsnspKpcjfsFwunYXPSNo6u6ItggIVgX8z+NWgTFC75 LK1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnkFirM7ZGKAqxhIJ3lgTEpjrG5+tWPKjGM7FKDiH0FEil6m4OGVlllZfUSd6aWi/N983EX
X-Received: by 10.42.60.201 with SMTP id r9mr1167786ich.32.1396968062289; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 07:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:4900:1042:1:9c96:2611:4a5c:f2d0? ([2001:4900:1042:1:9c96:2611:4a5c:f2d0]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id sc8sm3653793igb.0.2014.04.08.07.41.01 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Apr 2014 07:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <5344076A.3010906@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:40:58 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <46D2440D-4937-4590-B749-21A11319CF17@hopcount.ca>
References: <A1679B19-C0C5-4CE9-91DA-29FA3BD03CF3@gmail.com> <20140403215020.GH58655@mx1.yitter.info> <F0260771-EF61-4C12-91A7-C98F311DBED2@vpnc.org> <nPeW1n01A0xxhYs01PeXE5> <4F8D85D7-6872-4511-9549-FE73C5750734@cox.net> <5343FF78.70800@redhat.com> <FF297BBE-81DD-4E01-9EC6-A1E1A4D05929@hopcount.ca> <5344076A.3010906@redhat.com>
To: Petr Spacek <pspacek@redhat.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/OFMSybQYUMfk4-Z-nOuyEOHN7Aw
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft new charter: add stub resolvers?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 14:41:07 -0000

On 8 Apr 2014, at 10:27, Petr Spacek <pspacek@redhat.com> wrote:

> I would rather see RFC 4025, RFC 4255, draft-wouters-dane-openpgp and draft-wouters-dane-openpgpkey-usage to be practically implemented and widely used sooner than later.

I would like to see those things too. But they're a bit useless without a solid way for applications to retrieve and validate the signed records.

Time spent making the API available and promoting its use amongst developers would bring us closer to DANE being useful.


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email