Re: [DNSOP] Application level DNS message fragmentation

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Tue, 09 December 2014 05:58 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7AB1A1DBD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:58:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SFG_vqwz0XGk for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:58:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:500:60::65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A0171A1EEB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:58:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF1C1FCB65; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 05:58:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1AD16005A; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 06:03:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c211-30-183-50.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.183.50]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F6AC160056; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 06:03:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC242529C28; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:58:39 +1100 (EST)
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20141208083212.GA13206@totoro.home.mukund.org> <54868E4B.9060608@redbarn.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 08 Dec 2014 21:53:15 -0800." <54868E4B.9060608@redbarn.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:58:39 +1100
Message-Id: <20141209055839.CBC242529C28@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Og3S3f4tCvYrflqhwLmZC2AxHO4
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Application level DNS message fragmentation
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 05:58:52 -0000

In message <54868E4B.9060608@redbarn.org>, Paul Vixie writes:
> this was originally proposed in EDNS, but failed to reach consensus.

Which doesn't mean it won't reach consensus now.  Too many moving pieces
back then.

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org