IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-muks-dns-message-checksums-00.txt

Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org> Mon, 28 September 2015 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <muks@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0069B1AD0C0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0KjChQ-z8wVQ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.banu.com (mail.banu.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:644b::225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52ABD1AD1FE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jurassic.l0.malgudi.org (unknown [117.215.83.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.banu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06ADC2BA0DF9; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 17:32:59 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 23:02:56 +0530
From: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org>
To: Robert Edmonds <edmonds@mycre.ws>
Message-ID: <20150928173255.GA23429@jurassic.l0.malgudi.org>
References: <20150926191009.28433.58915.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20150926191551.GA32562@jurassic.l0.malgudi.org> <20150928173028.GA2328@mycre.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150928173028.GA2328@mycre.ws>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PetBlrxdURTSIw5AsC-g9MZVzBU>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-muks-dns-message-checksums-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 17:33:03 -0000

Hi Robert

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 01:30:28PM -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> 16 bits is an awful lot of space for the ALGORITHM field.  Compare to
> the DNSSEC algorithm number field, which is only 8 bits.

Do you suggest changing it to 8 bits too?

		Mukund

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email