IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt]

Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> Wed, 06 April 2016 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <shane@time-travellers.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D26C12D6E8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7WR-tclLC5Wc for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time-travellers.nl.eu.org (c.time-travellers.nl.eu.org [IPv6:2a02:2770::21a:4aff:fea3:eeaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F227A12D6E7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2001:67c:370:160:c68e:8fff:fef5:64bd] (helo=pallas.home.time-travellers.org) by time-travellers.nl.eu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <shane@time-travellers.org>) id 1anrJm-0007Ap-5Y; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 17:32:38 +0000
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:32:31 -0300
From: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Message-ID: <20160406143231.4ffc893f@pallas.home.time-travellers.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160406163715.GA27110@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <20160406163715.GA27110@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Sig_/gH114h8zc49Qdi4lxU0b_bk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PtsxUbQJwKrMrqLzqR8doirBZUw>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 17:32:49 -0000

Stephane,

At 2016-04-06 13:37:15 -0300
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:

> This draft is a result of a proposal I made in Yokohama
> <https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-dnsop-8.pdf>
> where it seems it received some interest.
> 
> I do not ask to discuss it during our DNSOP meetings (I sent it too
> late for that and there are still too many TODOs). But it is part of
> the RFC 6761 discussion that we all love spending our time with :-)

Hm, interesting.

One minor possible concern is with .ONION, where I assume that the Tor
operators would prefer as little leakage as possible. It seems that a
DNAME to EMPTY.AS112.ARPA which goes to an unmanaged anycast network
might be an increase in leakage. (It may also be that if
EMPTY.AS112.ARPA is already cached that it would be a decrease in
leakage, since no additional query would go to the AS112 servers?)

I admit that even in the worst case it is probably not a LOT more
leakage, but I think that it is some? Or am I misunderstanding?

Cheers,

--
Shane

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email