Re: [DNSOP] refer-down

[Andrew Sullivan <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:08:36AM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> good to have. You seem to have put a lot of effort into it; perhaps you
> can update it as a clarification that provides more detail.

It was just ancillary effort needed to make the terminology-bis
discussion work, so it wasn't really much effort.  Maybe it's useful
text to have around if we ever get around to fixing up STD13 to be a
modern document, but perhaps not that useful just now, since most
people are unlikely to read it anyway.  Also, you're the only person
who's commented directly and that makes me think the WG isn't going to
do much review of it, which makes me think the effort would be
rewarded with more effort and then no document coming out :)

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
[e-mail]